Antitrust
- Antitrust refers to laws and regulations designed to mitigate market power of monopolies, with the intent of making markets more competitive
- Antitrust conduct falls into two categories
- Per se: price fixing, market division
- Rule of reason: most everything else
- In order to understand why current laws are the way they are, we need some background
- Why society wanted regulation
- How these regulations were flawed (from an economic efficiency perspective)
Antitrust background: Pre-Civil War
- Prior to the Civil War, monopolies didn’t cause many problems
- This doesn’t mean that the market then was perfectly competitive
- Lack of transportation and absence of accurate market information insulated local businesses from competition
- Nonetheless industries were relatively unconcentrated and were populated by small firms.
- During the war, demand for products such as guns, shoes, and machinery skyrocketed
- Economies of scale in certain industries led to an increase in concentration
- Surprisingly, firms still generally behaved competitively
Antitrust background: Post-Civil War
- After the Civil War, many farmers and small businesses became unprofitable (agricultural depression)
- Farmers were required to pay substantial taxes to keep the railroads running
- Railroads priced competitively if there were multiple railroads servicing specific routes; however, they increased prices in cities without competition
- Local grain elevators behaved similarly based on the degree of competition nearby
- Low prices of farm products
- Public opinion began to turn against big businesses
- Many big businesses used predatory pricing (i.e. Standard Oil)
- Political corruption became apparent
- Farmers and small businesses started to lobby the government for regulation
Antitrust background: Cartels
- Profits of big businesses increased even more with the formation of cartels
- Cartels are agreements between firms to collude
- Cartels operated in various forms across a wide variety of industries (i.e. oil, railroads, alcohol, metals, coal, lumber, meat)
- Price-fixing agreements where firms agreed to set prices arbitrarily high
- Restraint of trade
Antitrust background: Cartel cheating
Cartels typically don’t last long
- Firms in the cartel could cheat by undercutting the cartel price
- Results in an unraveling of the cartel
Cartels tried to prevent cheating
- A pool is a cartel agreement where all members combine and split their profits.
- Pools did not mitigate all incentives to cheat
Antitrust background: Trusts
While pools worked in some cases, they weren’t super effective
- Pools were eventually replaced by trusts, a group of firms that allow a third party to make the majority of operating decisions
- Designed to allow the group of firms to behave like a monopoly without merging
The general public hated trusts
- Trusts used their market power to charge exceptionally high prices
- Trusts corrupted public employees and lawmakers, who then enacted protective tariffs to further increase the market power of the trusts
- Resulted in trusts having substantial power over communities by controlling the factories and plants